To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 24545
24544  |  24546
Subject: 
Re: LEGO Packaging - was(Re: Triangle Area LEGO Rep)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:29:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1693 times
  
Not really, the part is almost always visible, but just disguised or blocked in
some way.
-Jon

In lugnet.general, Tony Priestman writes:
> Could it be that the lead time for the design & manufacture of the
> packaging meant that they didn't actually *have* a production sample of
> the unseen rare parts, which may have been making their first outing in
> these sets?
> 
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Steve Bliss (<hlka1t0ijsfuc7h66h739v8q6gvi0adr2a@4a
> x.com>) wrote at 15:54:31
> 
> > In lugnet.general, Jon Kozan wrote:
> > 
> > > My best note on packaging is LEGO's continuing habit of "hiding" parts.
> > > On nearly every set's packaging that I've looked at, the alternative and
> > > standard models scenes on the outside of the boxes will go out of their way
> > > to hide certain parts from view.
> > 
> > I doubt that this is intentional.  Even if it seems like it is.
> > 
> > > You have to buy the set to know what parts are inside.
> > 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGO Packaging - was(Re: Triangle Area LEGO Rep)
 
Could it be that the lead time for the design & manufacture of the packaging meant that they didn't actually *have* a production sample of the unseen rare parts, which may have been making their first outing in these sets? On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Steve (...) (26 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.general)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR