To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 24545
24544  |  24546
Subject: 
Re: LEGO Packaging - was(Re: Triangle Area LEGO Rep)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:29:16 GMT
Viewed: 
943 times
  
Not really, the part is almost always visible, but just disguised or blocked in
some way.
-Jon

In lugnet.general, Tony Priestman writes:
Could it be that the lead time for the design & manufacture of the
packaging meant that they didn't actually *have* a production sample of
the unseen rare parts, which may have been making their first outing in
these sets?

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Steve Bliss (<hlka1t0ijsfuc7h66h739v8q6gvi0adr2a@4a
x.com>) wrote at 15:54:31

In lugnet.general, Jon Kozan wrote:

My best note on packaging is LEGO's continuing habit of "hiding" parts.
On nearly every set's packaging that I've looked at, the alternative and
standard models scenes on the outside of the boxes will go out of their way
to hide certain parts from view.

I doubt that this is intentional.  Even if it seems like it is.

You have to buy the set to know what parts are inside.




Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGO Packaging - was(Re: Triangle Area LEGO Rep)
 
Could it be that the lead time for the design & manufacture of the packaging meant that they didn't actually *have* a production sample of the unseen rare parts, which may have been making their first outing in these sets? On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Steve (...) (24 years ago, 18-Nov-00, to lugnet.general)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR