Subject:
|
Re: scans of LEGO stickers sheets available
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:58:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
I've been using the jpg file format.
Ryan
--
reply to: rjschave at home dot com
http://members.home.net/rjschave
"Ryan J Schave" <rjschave-nospam@home.com> wrote in message
news:G0442C.Ixv@lugnet.com...
> > OK, I have all these mentioned, including the Old Wild West stickers • (#365?), if I
> > get these scanned, is that good enough? Or do you need the originals?
> >
> > Gary Istok
>
> I don't need the originals. I've been scanning at 150 dpi. I use the set
> number as the filename so I can identify them. E-mail them to the address
> below and I'll post them as soon as I can.
>
> Sorting is another issue. I've just been adding new scans to the bottom • of
> the list. I was thinking of sorting the list by set number. Any other
> ideas? The sticker page already takes over a minute to load on a 28.8
> modem. I realize that not everyone has a cable modem. Should I put the
> scans on separate pages (like brickshelf - 0000, 1000's, 2000's, etc.)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
> --
>
> reply to: rjschave at home dot com
> http://members.home.net/rjschave
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: scans of LEGO stickers sheets available
|
| (...) (#365?), if I (...) I don't need the originals. I've been scanning at 150 dpi. I use the set number as the filename so I can identify them. E-mail them to the address below and I'll post them as soon as I can. Sorting is another issue. I've (...) (24 years ago, 30-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
