Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf problem
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Aug 2000 17:26:26 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(jsproat@)nospam(io.com)
|
Viewed:
|
620 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Dan Boger writes:
> > btw, any plans for brickshelf not needing java to work? Just adding a
> > META/REDIRECT tag would make it work for non-java enabled browsers... Also
> > I thought you can upload tgz files to be uncommpressed - was that disabled?
> Definitely a 2nd for using meta/redirect instead of or in addition to
> Javascript.
I vote for no Javascript.
> And as always, 3 cheers for providing us with such a wonderful resource!
I second that motion. :-,
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Is it still illegal if I copy just the FBI warning?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf problem
|
| (...) Definitely a 2nd for using meta/redirect instead of or in addition to Javascript. Another thing, I was just noticing in the instruction scans that you don't have an "up" like you do for the Gallery. Also, in the gallery, it would be a little (...) (24 years ago, 28-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
