To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 21255
21254  |  21256
Subject: 
Re: The LEGOCRATIC National Convention
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.va.new, lugnet.town, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 23 Aug 2000 04:31:31 GMT
Viewed: 
7533 times
  
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> "Nicholas Fezie" <NSFosaur@aol.com> wrote in message
> > I must disagree with you here Tim.  I believe Juniorization is actually
> > conservative because fewer parts are used.  Liberals would use as many
> > parts as possible to build models.  So that's my two cents.
> 
> If you're looking at it from the perspective of parts, yes.  But, I was
> looking at it from the POV of conservatives lean towards 'older' moral
> values (good sets, many pieces, _how they used to be_), where liberals seek
> change from those ways (juniorization).
> Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com

Correct there.  Seems like the basic views of the parties are in contention
with one another.  What a great controversy...

-Nick



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The LEGOCRATIC National Convention
 
"Nicholas Fezie" <NSFosaur@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzoHut.FI1@lugnet.com... (...) are (...) parts (...) If you're looking at it from the perspective of parts, yes. But, I was looking at it from the POV of conservatives lean towards 'older' (...) (26 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.va.new, lugnet.town, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR