Subject:
|
Re: Stolen picture in Lego Theme Gallery?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:17:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2238 times
|
| |
|
|
Can an assembly of LEGO bricks (ie a model) be copyrighted? Or is it the
photo of the model that can be copyrighted?
In lugnet.general, John VanZwieten writes:
>
> This provides a pretty clear case that they didn't even apply "due
> dillegence" to avoid copyright infringement. I think they should have to
> send $10 LSAH coupons to anyone whose copyrights are violated by their
> contest.
>
> -John Van
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Stolen picture in Lego Theme Gallery?
|
| (...) Exactly. You cannot (as far as I know) copyright an assembly of Lego, but a photograph that you took can be considered yours by law. example: Ansel Addams took many photographs of nature/landscapes in the black and white poster format. Those (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Stolen picture in Lego Theme Gallery?
|
| (...) <snip> IMHO, either way it is terrible that a parent will totally ignore recommended ages and let a newborn play with Lego System elements.:-) Maybe we are blowing this way out of proportion. Perhaps YinYinYin is short for Scott and Scott (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Stolen picture in Lego Theme Gallery?
|
| "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:FyBBnn.IMr@lugnet.com... (...) think (...) voting? (...) This provides a pretty clear case that they didn't even apply "due dillegence" to avoid copyright infringement. I think they should (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
