 | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Jim Baker
|
| | | Also sprach Janet Zorn: : And Beaker, I share your libertarian philosophy. Since when did the : libertarian philosophy become an excuse for "as nasty as they want to : be"? There is a difference between liberty and licentiousness. To me, the heart (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | This isn't exactly where I wanted this conversation to go, I think there are other, more important issues to thrash out, but I certainly don't OWN it, it will go where it will. That said, the following contributes to the tangentiality problem: I'll (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) I would as well. (...) Yep. Petition anyone? (...) No flaws? :) -Tim <>< (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Matthew Marshall
|
| | | | | | Profanity is only considered profanity because one or two people thought it was offensive. I mean the f-word(1) is simply a noun, a descriptive word. Like BFC, All they our nouns, Any word can be used to belittle or offend someone, i.e. You Redcoat, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Richard Dee
|
| | | | (...) You **must** add this to your random sig generator! Brilliant! (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation? —Jim Baker
|
| | | | Also sprach Richard Dee: :> 'Profanity is a linguistic crutch for ignorant motherf*****s.' : You **must** add this to your random sig generator! Brilliant! Already done. You'll see it eventually. I can't believe it wasn't in there already. Clearly (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
