 | | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
|
Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in message news:38C67488.21C488...ich.edu... (...) it in (...) have (...) rest. (...) What is (...) (Well, (...) prepares (...) minifigs are (...) stretcher in (...) to be (...) the (...) Now, (...) we (...) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
|
(...) I spoke with the learned (and opinionated) Dr. Cornelius(1) on this subject not long ago, and here is what he said to me: "You fools! Ze minifig race is nicht deschended from zese 'schtiffies'! Zat is absurdt! Zey haff no limbs! Ve are clearly (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
|
(...) You're all wrong--minifigs didn't "evolve"... They were created from the firmament so that to any logical observation they appear to have evolved, though in fact it's all a hoax! 8^) Dave! (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Speculation on the nature of minifigs (moved from Dear LEGO)
|
|
(...) As further support of this: We all know that modern minifig didn't exist before 197X (see Gary's post for the X, I think it's a 3, but I'm not completely sure). When they arrived on the scene they had complex tools and machines, like police (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.general)
|
