 | | Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Rob Farver wrote: <I'm pumped, I bet Gary I is too> Ditto. Believe me! (...) ?? You mean they used to be new but they recently became old?? :-) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!! —Barry McFarland
|
| | | | | (...) What is the Lego world coming to? Is this what we're left with??? The '99 stuff is Jr.ized so much that we're all doing back flips over a couple of new service packs!!? l;ksjaioue][ (sorry my feet hit the keyboard that time around on the (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!! —Robert Farver
|
| | | | (...) Well, when do you consider new sets to be old? I kinda figure since the 1999 sets are out and are "NEW" then anything older than 1999 is now old right? ;) Rob +---...---+ | Rob Farver - rfarver@rcn.com | | (URL) | | (URL) | +---...---+ (26 years ago, 21-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!! —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ah, a nice philosophical question. I'd say something is NEW if it's new this year, CURRENT, if it's still theoretically available and shown as part of the product line (Insectoids are CURRENT but not NEW), PHASED OUT, if you can find it in the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: STAND BACK! Rob Farver is going to have a heart attack!!! —Robert Farver
|
| | | | (...) Ok, then it's probably safe to say Pirates are recently old correct? They've been pretty well cleared out of all the TRUs and I only know one store in my area that has a single Pirate set left (Rocky Reef I believe, at full price, and with the (...) (26 years ago, 23-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
