To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 15138
    Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —Bill Farkas
   (...) Misconception. The Marines do far more than secure beaches. Why else were we in the forward areas of the desert and Viet Nam (and most conflicts for that matter)? The Marines, pound for pound, pack far more punch. We have staying power and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —William A. Swanberg
   "Bill Farkas" <kfar@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:Fq5B2D.I06@lugnet.com... (...) we in (...) staying (...) with the (...) Marines (...) Well, I wasn't going to mention the debacle that was Viet Nam, but since you brought it up... First, I (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        (canceled) —James Powell
    
         Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —William A. Swanberg
       "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:Fq6DA5.5Gu@lugnet.com... (...) planet (...) be (...) Forces (...) Let's take these one at a time. 1) This *is* a family forum, so please use appropriate language. 2) Don't confuse (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         My [blank] is bigger than your [blank] (was Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —Larry Pieniazek
      (...) While this is an interesting debate, may I remind you that this is a family forum? I'd rather you used more powerful rhetoric and less pungent words to get your point across... thanks. (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
    
         Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —Kurt Williams
     (...) Watch your mouth soldier boy. =) Regards, Kurt (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —Bill Farkas
   (...) My reference to Viet Nam was soley to point out the non-beach landing aspect, not that they were a main force. I agree with your assessment of the debacle over there, but that was due to politicians and not tacticians. Viet Nam had far more to (...) (24 years ago, 19-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
   
        Re: Just been spammed by Paul Koelewijn —John Neal
    (...) Hey now, try to stay on-topic in off-topic, soldier;-) -John (24 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR