To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 1458
1457  |  1459
Subject: 
Re: New Theory on Holey Bags
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:33:43 GMT
Viewed: 
973 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36792038.10445051@lugnet.com>...

I haven't heard this possible explanation before...

<snip>
SO, the bags have holes to let air out.  That way, no burst baggies.


I still like the rip-stopping explanation better.  Or maybe that the
holes allow minifigs to breathe...

I always thought (kids don't try this at home), if you accidentally lodged a
small bag, or piece of a bag in your throat, your air supply would not be
completely restricted.  I think that the bursting baggies, and rip-stopping
may be an beneficial side effect to the safety consideration.  Who knows
though?

A side note... I have heard that babies don't have to even swallow a bag to
choke; they can just fall on it and inhaling seals the bag around the mouth,
and exhaling just lets the air out.  this would be prevented by the holes
too.

LINC



Message is in Reply To:
  New Theory on Holey Bags
 
I haven't heard this possible explanation before... What's the aspect of producing LEGO sets that has the potential of being the more labor-intensive? It's the manual sorting of pieces -- that's why TLG spends a lot of money on expensive equipment (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR