Subject:
|
Re: Lego-Ideas.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:21:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2002 times
|
| |
|
|
"Tony Priestman" <Tony@you-rang.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GirkWYAmbym4EwrQ@you-rang.demon.co.uk...
> That's not to say that I think the Vikings were disreputable: they
> weren't. If someone were to say 'Viking' to me, I'd think 'sea and river
> faring explorers, traders and settlers' just before thinking 'artists
> and story tellers'.
>
> But that's probably not what most people think, as you've already
> admitted that you think the Vikings were bad :-)
I agree. I always thought of and read about Vikings in the same light you
shined on this thread. Pirates on the other hand, have almost always been
the foils of heros.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lego-Ideas.
|
| On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Kevin Wilson (<389B0A61.B5C7C29C@...erve.com>) wrote at 17:20:33 (...) It depends whose side you were on. (...) Ahh. Because Pirates have already been romanticised by others into friendly, mostly harmless sailors and scallywags. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
