| | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!! Eric Brouwer
|
| | Also, consider the fact of how EASY it would be to recreate this thing form parts we all have laying around. I would guesstimate only 2000 pieces in the work. If you printed a nice quality copy of the auction list, I think it would be easy enough to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!! Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ah. Interesting. When does something shade over from being a design or decoration to a work of art? Theoretically, if I copy a work of art, even if I get it exactly right, it's a forgery... If Lego Bricks are the medium, is that still true? Is (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!! Eric Brouwer
|
| | | | | (...) I would say any MOC could be considered a work of art. It is the "artist" who puts the pieces in a certain arrangement, creating a new piece out of other smaller pieces. (...) True a person's reproduction would be a forgery, but unless someone (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | Re: For Your Eyes Only !!! Eric Brouwer
|
| | | | The lister wrote me back. It was just a MOC by the average fan of the brick. The listing was to test Auctionwatch.com. They really didn't plan on selling the item. Although if that minimum bid is met, who could turn down the cash!?! (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |