Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.belville, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 16 Jan 2000 18:13:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
84 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Marchetti wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.belville, Shiri Dori writes:
> > (2) Yeah, I know most of you just like it for parts, but still...
>
> Hey, everyone likes everything for parts -- parts is what its about. The • real
> problem is one of scale, and secondarily one of price. Belville figs means
> having to go to another scale in building and for a theme where the figures
> available are quite limited. And then there is price -- the price is just • WAY
> beyond what I want to spend regularly on this particular hobby. Still, for
> certain specialty items that I want to feature prominently for some reason • or
> other, Belville satisfies quite nicely. But if they started featuring • these
> great parts in system sets, and did a Millimy in minifig scale, I wouldn't
> shed a tear for Belville's passing. (Actually, I might make a millimy of • my
> own anyway...but you get the point.)
>
> The only figure for Belville I have truly looked forward to is the new evil
> witch in blue, or whatever she is.
What would be really neat is if the figures/dolls were sold separately (not
just in addition to, but not be in the sets). The sets might still contain
the clothing, but I'd rather see that separately also. That would reduce the
price of the sets significantly, yet not increase the price overly much for
those actually buying them to actually use with the figures. I can see
people who use the figures wanting multiples of some sets, but not needing
two or more of each figure.
Of course I think Millimy would still come with each set (I'm sure most of
why Millimy is in the current sets is to encourage people to get all the
sets), but being a single piece, she must not be very expensive to
manufacture (at least compared to the regular figures).
Of course this same idea would apply to Scala.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
| (...) This is a good idea, but it's pretty obvious (IMO) that TLG wouldn't do it. Two basic reasons: 1. This would reduce the price of the set for YOU, meaning it will reduce the profit of TLG - you pay less, and (as you said) not too many people (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
| (...) Hey, everyone likes everything for parts -- parts is what its about. The real problem is one of scale, and secondarily one of price. Belville figs means having to go to another scale in building and for a theme where the figures available are (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
