| |
Matthew Miller wrote in message ...
> It's not a new thing -- the trend was definitely there in 1996's • <set:8422>.
> There's still beams with studs, but it's not the primary means of
> construction.
I was surprised at how many beams came with 8448. I agree.
>
>
> I don't think so. Technic may go more this way, but the system lines won't
> so much. And there will still be some of the "old way" in technic. It's • part
> of a whole Primo -> Duplo -> System -> Technic chain.
Again I agree. System bricks don't connect to Duplo or Primo[1], right?
[1][2] ...or should I call it Baby now?
[2] First time number system user. I think I like parentheses more...
---D M Garcia
http://members.xoom.com/swlego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Death of the studded brick
|
| (...) System bricks do connect to DUPLO, but only 2xY bricks, fairly secure (the tube fits into the hollow in the DUPLO stud). DUPLO will also connect to System bricks (but not as well as the other way around). Unfortuanately, DUPLO baseplates don't (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Death of the studded brick
|
| (...) It's not a new thing -- the trend was definitely there in 1996's <set:8422>. There's still beams with studs, but it's not the primary means of construction. (...) I don't think so. Technic may go more this way, but the system lines won't so (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
