 | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Linc Smith
|
| | | Jesse Long wrote in message ... (...) any (...) to (...) very (...) I am the same... 15 groups, and very manageable number of articles. I figure I will cut out some in a month or so... see where the off-topic groups go? *My* answer to your question: (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Sarah Heacock
|
| | | | (...) "for the people by the people" does NOT necessarily mean "you suck, no you suck, not you suck more" and I think that LugNET news server points this out quite clearly. Mr. Lehman is quite open to comments from everyone -- and he even listens (...) (26 years ago, 15-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lugnet's great signal to noise ratio —Linc Smith
|
| | | | Perhaps a Princess.... wrote in message (...) I agree completely. What I was trying to say was, the *opportunity* to make such posts, with no recourse, exits within the Usenet. Not that Usenet or "for the people by the people"-systems are defined (...) (26 years ago, 16-Oct-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
