General Discussion : 12960


General / 12960	12959 \| 12961

Subject:	Re: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on
Newsgroups:	lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general
Date:	Sat, 1 Jan 2000 21:51:42 GMT
Viewed:	128 times

Doug Finney wrote in message ... > Rick Kujawa writes: > > > I think this email update idea is terrible. Some people might not be > > at their computer that moment the availability is posted. It will > > lead to box sniping. > > Box sniping? Please define. He's making an analogy to auction sniping on places like eBay where people with nothing better to do with their time hover over auctions which are about to end, and chuck in a bid which might win the auction, with seconds to go, so the people who have been bidding all along don't have a chance to react. By taking the first person who e-mails when a box is ready to move along to the next person, people who pay close attention to the messages will get the boxes far more often than someone who checks messages once a day. I do see this as a problem. We do want to speed up the turn around time for boxes, but we don't want to totally leave people out (unless they're totally irresponsible). Frank

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on
Frank Filz wrote in message ... (...) the (...) I don't see this as a problem if people are restricted so as not to re-recieve a box before all those on the list have been accounted for, or perhaps not to receive the same box twice in say 3 months. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		RE: Calling for Box Status and New Rule to vote on
(...) Box sniping? Please define. Doug (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya, lugnet.general)

25 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search