 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 —Shiri Dori
|
| | | (...) I agree. LEGO definitely doesn't need our support, because otherwise they would've taken us much more seriously. I mean, c'mon, TLC can find LUGNET easily - it's probably the second that comes up in -any- search motor, after themselves, but (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) There is significant circumstantial evidence, and numerous reports that Lego *does* read Lugnet. It is also rumoured (by people uninclined to hyperbole) that there are people in the Lego Company hierarchy who read/monitor Lugnet and RTL as (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Well said. --Todd (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 —Richard Franks
|
| | | | | (...) I don't know quite why but I'm reminded of the film 'Misery'.. Richard (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000 —Jim Piccuito
|
| | | | (...) of (...) things (...) Todd (...) info, (...) which (...) are (...) Hey, everyone I have been collecting legos for years myself and I have never complained about their service. I had friends that work for lego and they said TLC does what they (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
