Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 22:21:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1676 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> If heads of the LEGO Company wanted their retailer catalog to be publicly
> available, they most certainly could publish it online all by themselves. But
> first, I think they would distribute it to all the retailers who right now are
> waiting for their copies to arrive.
It's not about what we might think they wouldn't mind, but what they don't want
us to see? Whatever reason TLC have is fair enough.
> I am very disapointed in this insipid behavior. Acting proud about "knowing
> someone on the inside" and doing something wrong to prove it does not make a
> person cool -- It jeopardizes their moral character.
>
> Trust me. this one is not worth it. please let it go.
>
> It doesn't take a leak to be popular. I know you're all capable of investing
> your enthusiasm and efforts in far more productive ways.
I agree with the feeling, but as we haven't heard from Huw, calling it "insipid
behavior" isn't really fair as it could have just been an oversight. For the
same reason, applying the other comments to Huw are a bit premature.
Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Jeremy, with all due repect, you're missing the point. If heads of the LEGO Company wanted their retailer catalog to be publicly available, they most certainly could publish it online all by themselves. But first, I think they would distribute (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
