 | | better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
Does anyone have better scans of the Arctic polar bears in the 2000 catalogue? I'm interested in knowing if they have studs on their backs -- from the Brickshelf scans, it looks like they don't. That would be quite a letdown for me -- I had plans (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) I'll see if I can scan one in this weekend, but I can confirm that they are stud-less. On the upside, the head moves. :) Jeff (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) "Stud-less", eh? I didn't know you could tell their gender from the pictures! Oh, the places this could go.... DaveE (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) What can I say? I have an eye for detail. Sometimes, as in this case, I wish I didn't. :) (...) I'm printing this out and putting it in a rocket destined for Mars... Jeff (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) Domesticating Polar Bears!? Polar Bears are the only mammal on earth that will attack a human unprovoked. In truth every one of those Arctic minifigs should have a revolver or rifle. The first thing an Alaskin and I would assume Canadian (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) Maybe that is true, but a hippo will attack when a boat comes lazying by...saw that on animal planet... (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) OOoh, and manatees...pesky manatees, they always seem to "attack" boat propellers in the Everglades...evil, ferocious, vicious beasts...! Oh yeah, and dolphins. Always squeaking! Squeak squeak squeak! Assault my ears no more, foul beasts!!! (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) That's true, given the use put to them in set 5988 (in dkgrey). One of the consterning things for me about sharks and dolphins is that they were really hard to modify owing to that limited studdibility (is that a word? Coinage alert!). I (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
Who me? I never put saddles on alligators -- but at least they have studs, like all good Lego pieces should. Polar bears were going to be the beasts of burden and transportation for my Alpine King in his Ice Castle. -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
"Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:3847722E.465B46...msu.edu... (...) I'm (...) Laugh...that was actually on CBS last night here in the US. I'd not seen that one for years. Tom (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears?
|
|
(...) Those polar bears are female! I*nu*it! I think the female polar bears are the bigger, meaner ones anyhow (can anyone confirm this?)--but with all that hair, I think that on the brick itself the differences would be bearly visible. ABS doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
