|
|
 | | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
| Daniel Rubin wrote: > In person, they look OK, less cartoony anyways. It's a pretty decent model of a (...) All of the above should be present in the larger Technic version. Jindroush www.kostky.org - for Czech Lego fans. (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005)
| | | | | Re: Samsonite LEGO in 1960s SEARS catalogs
|
| (...) Eric, Many Lego collectors think that the first Lego Motor came in 1966 with the beginning of the Train System (which came out in mid-1966 in Europe). Here it shows that the first Lego motor actually came out in late 1965 in the USA to be used (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Set #271 Policemen
|
| (...) Hey Ronald, I did forget one additional thing about the #271 sets. There was also a #1271 set. This was the same set. From 1955-58 Denmark, Sweden and Norway had their own numbering system for Lego sets and Lego spare parts packs that had an (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Some 2005 sets showing up already in regular stores.
|
| snip (...) In person, they look OK, less cartoony anyways. It's a pretty decent model of a kinda ugly car. What it's really lacking are steering, suspension, doors, and for some reason, the window to the engine is build on an opaque plate, I will be (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2005, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Lego Company chooses poorly? (was re: Shifty set)
|
| (...) Indeed. Although a headline like "Rich Multinational Toy Company Gives Poor Finnish Children Second Rate Building Bricks for Christmas" could hardly appeal to Lego... Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
|
