 | | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) I think the general view expressed so far suggests that many long-term TECHNIC builders are still firmly married to the studded system, that many people who have gone heavily into Mindstorms have found reasons to cross over, and kids are (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) The ironic thing is that there is no TECHNIC clone on the market (making the one on the left more distinctly "LEGO"), and parents often get confused about what is truly LEGO product vs. what is a clone product. (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Who made this Frog
|
|
(...) Thanks Corey I to belive sum better pics would be really REALLY nice if they could be found. I hope someone can do this. But, being that the builders do not use instructions this will not be happening,,,,,sad. Tom (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
On 20:21 07/12/2004, Kevin Blocksidge wrote (...) Hey! I'm good with the sarcastic crap! I definitely do not think LEGO is above criticism... Its mostly that its like a repeating thread. wub doesn't let too much upset him... tho "next"ing thru an (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) Yes, and that's my whole point. Technic _was_ part of the System and it's not anymore. It's more Znap than System and that's what I (and probably some others) don't like. (...) You misread what I wrote. Modern Technic is cumbersome, not (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richie Dulin wrote: <snip> (...) I'm going to go on the record in saying that there *nothing* too serious to joke about. -Orion (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
(...) The form letter left out a key sentence: This subject is far too serious to joke about. (...) But was he actually complaining, or just commenting? Cheers Richie Dulin (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
(...) I thought Stephen's post was humorous. He's got a point: people need to lighten up. I know of a lot of great builders who've gotten fed up with all the complaining that goes on at Lugnet, so much so that they don't read or post often anymore. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
Jeez, Stephen! Granted my post wasn't positive, but I think you now look the bigger whiner here. In my post I addressed completely legitimate complaints with a product I've loved for decades (and which I feel completely justified in offering an (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) You know, even though you probably weren't trying to, I think you just answered my biggest question. I've always been looking at the old TECHNIC parts in terms of combining TECHNIC aspects into System constructions, which is a big advantage (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) Not true. I've been collecting since the days of the maxifigs and non-articulated minifigs. Yes, I've found a new degree of freedom in the BIONICLE series that wasn't present before, but I do still build with basic bricks. I've just never done (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) You expressed several good points including some I had. I think a lot of the rants are coming from people who remember the first technic models and how easily they could mix basic parts in technic models and vice versa. Today it is a bit (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) I guess I should have been more specific and restricted my request to just TECHNIC models. As I've said before, I use TECHNIC bricks quite a bit when I want TECHNIC functions in a non-TECHNIC MOC, but I rarely use them instead of liftarms in a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) The advantage of Technic bricks over liftarms comes when you want to add some Technic features (gears, etc.) to a mostly-non-Technic model. But for a purely Technic model like these dune buggies, the studless liftarms provide a much cleaner (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3
|
|
Use the following message to explain why _you_ are a "Fan No More"(tm). Save this message for next year when a whole new batch of "Fan no More"(tm) messages will surface... ---...---cut here---...--- standard FAN-NO-MORE complaint form v0.9.3 [ ] (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general) !!
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) Bam! There's my objection, I think. Lego used to be more of a system, and it's gradually turning into several different systems. It's not that they're not compaitable, it's that they're LESS compatible, or less related. Studded beams, while (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) Personally I prefer the stud-free version of this model, but I prefer the studded beams from the standpoint of a non-Technic builder. Studded technic beams are a great SNOT element in normal bricks-and-plates construction, either by sticking (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) I'm biased basic brick user. You're biased Bionicle user. (...) Stud free Technic liftarm is {almost} useless when you want to use other (non-Technic) studded parts. Technic bricks with plates make better frames for stuff like cars. Usage of (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) How about whenever you try to use Technic parts in a "non Technic" model? Something like (URL) my theatre>, for example? Stud-free is great for some things like (URL) Dan Siskind's bascule bridge> (on the right), but for most stuff I'd prefer (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A fan no more
|
|
(...) I can't speak for anyone else, but I wasn't angry. Every time this subject comes up, I keep hoping to see some more specific instances where the old-style TECHNIC works better, but all I ever see is "everything". It's clearly not true, or (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
