 | | Unknown part: Brick 2 x 4 with hole
|
|
Among a lot of 2nd hand lego from the seventies (ca 1971 - 1977, no older bricks) I found a red 2x4 brick with a small hole in the top. The hole looks perfect, so I don't think someone has drilled it in the brick. I could not find any reference (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
 | | Re: A request for everyone, regarding a pet peeve
|
|
(...) I've noticed on occassion that a new reply is disconnected from the previous thread (the original thread is still there, but the new post shows up as the start of a second thread), and I've long wondered if it had something to do with the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: notes within the set guides
|
|
"Josh Baakko" <josh@blockchoice.com> wrote in message news:Hyt0w3.15u@lugnet.com... (...) sets, (...) webspace (...) "Braging" (...) something (...) Since this is a feature only available to members, I don't see a problem with the members using the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | notes within the set guides
|
|
I've noticed for some time that some people put some WASTEFUL notes about sets, for instance: (URL) the notes "MISB" or "##% off"... I've mostly wondered how much webspace these notes waste? I've been tracking some of mine down that were "Braging" (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
 | | Re: A request for everyone, regarding a pet peeve
|
|
(...) Just for reference, the problem that Ram is describing is wholly separate from what I'm talking about. His question seems to involve the expiration of parts of a thread, while I'm referring to the omission of source-links in follow-up posts. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|