 | | Re: New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
So what was all this about? (URL) have two words to explain why some people are getting disatisfied with LUGNET: "membership packet" (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Digitally Signed Email
|
|
FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrnc385ha.8ka.....bu.edu... (...) good (...) It's a little silly to say "Simply have all users convince their ISP to change their email infrastructure". I'll (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | New homepage for LUGNET
|
|
Someone brought this up at BrickFest PDX and others agreed it would be an excellent idea: Rather than mainly linking to internal LUGNET resources, the first thing someone should see when they visit the LUGNET homepage is iconic links to other major (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Not just another Mega Bloks vs. Lego article
|
|
(...) DO YOU HAVE TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT? IF YOU DO CAN ANYONE COPY THE ARTICLE AND EMAIL IT TO ME PLEASE? - JEFF (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.quatro, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
| |
| | Re: repeat of set?
|
|
(...) But, 7212 is not a new set, it came out at about the same time as 4098. They are very similar, but 7212 was originally an airline exclusive. The previous airline exclusives, have AFAIK all been smaller sets so there must be some reason for (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Demographical Question
|
|
(...) hey afols! fyi, my wife jennifer and i are super fans of lego! i own roughly 2 million pieces, and she own %50 of those by law! i am the avid modeler, she gets most joy dissassemling torsos and endangering their lives on my 9v train tracks. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Not just another Mega Bloks vs. Lego article
|
|
(...) I inferred that excerpt to suggest that licensed (and juniorized, incidentally) playset/diorama-style sets were less successful than the more interactive vehicles. I suppose we could both be correct. (...) That's news to me, too. I figured (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not just another Mega Bloks vs. Lego article
|
|
Thomas & All, Thanks for the link, interesting read. put my response to just general. Here is what caught my eye in this article, Thomas pointed out some good ones already. (...) This is a fascinating bit of text. I was under the impression that (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Color confusion regarding 4755 Kinght Bus
|
|
I saw this picture today of the new 4755 Knight Bus from the 2004 HP line: (URL) really makes me wonder. The color on the box art is so radically different from the actual bricks. Is this just a probem with the photo? What color is the bus going to (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Not just another Mega Bloks vs. Lego article
|
|
There are some really interesting tidbits about Lego and Mega Bloks in this article from the Kansas City Star (requires registration to view): (URL) there is a lot in here that is general knowledge, including a concise report on the falling numbers (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.quatro, lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
