 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Well (I do not post this as an argument for or against in the discussion), that seems to be exactly what has happened now. All sets not available to the general public yet, have been taken off the Marz Distribution site. With friendly (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Coolest LEGO Experience?
|
|
(...) Hmm, I may have a new coolest LEGO experience... This year I got several brick presents for Christmas. The first one I opened was a plastic case of used LEGO my mom had found in a yardsale. Insider were the instructions for 6391, and a bunch (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) hm...hadn't thought of that. You're right. No wonder I got the confidentiality form when I got my job:) Joe Meno (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Hi Joe - I believe a dealer catalog, obtained by and scanned by an individual who is not a dealer and placed on the internet would constitute a leak. I recall being at LEGO's office in NYC a couple years ago and having to almost beg for a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Joe, My definitions were more based on the usage at fbtb.net, where there is a strong "no discussion of leaks" policy. Bruce (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Hm. Apparently I'm a bit more liberal in my categorizations, as Bruce does have a valid point in LEGO/store communications. A counterpoint to this, though would be while the first two could constitute leaks, the Marz site would not...to a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
(...) Tough question. A leak is an item of information that is NOT meant to be released. Most, if not all of your examples that you cited were meant to be released to, at least initially, to the dealers who sell LEGO. As such, I wouldn't list these (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
|
Paul, The policy at fbtb is that there should be no discussion of leaks. The policy at lugnet, on the other hand, is pretty much anything goes. So feel free to discuss these here at Lugnet, but refrain from doing so on fbtb. As to your examples, the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Understanding Leaks
|
|
Hi All, This may have been covered before, but as a relative newbie, I'd like to better understand what is meant when people talk about "leaks." I've noticed a number of folks talk about leaks in both LUGNET and FBTB, and gotten the impression that (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | BrikTrak 2002 build 220 now available.
|
|
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to let those of you who use it know that a new version of BrikTrak 2002 has been posted on the website. This version fixes a very obvious bug in previous versions; it no longer expires after December 31st 2002! (Sorry about (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
"Avi Parvin" <parvin@netvision.net.il> wrote in message news:H8B4pB.n5@lugnet.com... (...) (Don't (...) When the set is avaiable I will buy a few sets and try everything :) (Hope there is a tank in the set, because I dont have one yet) The fun with (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
"Avi Parvin" <parvin@netvision.net.il> wrote in message news:H8B4pB.n5@lugnet.com... (...) solved (...) to (...) Th family car is an idea I like to see more of too. But, let's take a moment to look at the auto manufactures and market consists of in (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerning this new train poll
|
|
(...) Who has made the last couple train-related polls? And why would he mention the subject now? (...) E=MC² (...) Seems to me that the numbers speak for themselves (...) There is no particular measure to 'fun', everybody enjoys a different degree (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about that, perhaps the liftarm is just to support the knob. (...) I think the red thing is just the handle at the end of the hose. (...) That was also my initial thought. But... I think it's too good to be true. (...) Wow! What a (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Concerning this new train poll
|
|
(...) Hi Harvey, it has been me, who criticised your poll. Larry was only jumping in much later in the thread and he did not even uttered your name, was NOT speaking about your poll, but about making up polls in general. ***...*** Really, if people (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) I did not mean function-wise, I meant partwise. I'd like more turntables :) (...) That must be a sight... /Tobbe (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) The hose I most likely a thing for the non-existing (?) Technic figures to run around spraying with. The red bit is probably the noozle. The white thing in the back appears to be some sort of styling and a tan/gold disc can be seen. Perhaps (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Concerning this new train poll
|
|
Mr. Larry Pieniazek, I don't appreciate you slamming and insulting each and everything I have to say. Who cares if this poll doesn't include every possible option, LUGNET is (or was) supposed to be fun! I thought we had 'discussed' this before. Now (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
|
(...) Maybe it controls the hose arm on top? (...) Looks like a hose. (...) I'd say definitely 6. (...) Very unlikely. But I don't think you need a tank when you're using the manual pump. (...) Looks like ordinary flex hose to me - dunno why it (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Construction Toy In LDraw Format!
|
|
(...) I think I still have a copy of the original knex parts, and a slightly reworked version in ldraw units (just in case you like to mix your virtual construction toys). I don't have the lincoln log parts though. Don (23 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
