 | | Re: Where are the 2003 Lego retail catalogs?
|
|
(...) I just opened a <set:7415 Areo Nomad> and got a catalog. Too bad it was a 2002 catalog. :-( Me thinks LEGO might not of had the catalogs printed in time for the first 2003 sets in North America. Jude (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 10066 on LSAH
|
|
(...) Oh, BiG question… I don’t know what a ‘bunch’ means to you, but I too purchased a “bunch.” (14 in total) So I've got 14 of set #10066 and 5 of another bulk set. But here’s the deal: Am I gonna get 15% off!!! I really hope the offer applies to (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 10066 on LSAH
|
|
(...) Oh, BiG question… I don’t know what a ‘bunch’ means to you, but I too purchased a “bunch.” (14 in total) So I've got 14 of set #10066 and 5 of another bulk set. But here’s the deal: Am I gonna get 15% off!!! I really hope the offer applies to (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Where are the 2003 Lego retail catalogs?
|
|
Hello everyone, I have purchased a few of the new 2003 sets just to get copies of the retail catalog. For some reason, such catalogs were not included with the larger kits I bought, and I'm just curious if there is a reason for this. I know that in (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) More than you might think. However I think if we veer off into discussion of this in more depth, it probably belongs in off-topic.debate. (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What's the big deal about the Mini TIE?
|
|
(...) Chicken Elmo! Tastes like chicken! Ticket Me Elmo! With radar detector! Patch Pack Kids! Help your kids overcome their smoking addiction! Care Bares! Who knew a teddy bear could be this um... fun. ;^) :^D ~GAMH (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) I was interested to hear what you would think of all this. But, for my part, an attack on our community is an attack on me. Also, I'm sure the irony hasn't escaped you that the revulsion people direct toward your site is based on the very (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick Testament site linked with child porn case??!!
|
|
(...) While we beat up this reporter for not understanding BT, let's be a little more careful in our reading of the article. It didn't connect BT with child p*rn; it used it as an example of the poor judgement this person exercised in his choice of (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Borrowed" Lamborghini Diablo design on Ebay.de
|
|
Ultimately this may be the best thing to happen. There's some understanding and a whole lot of us learned something from it. I wonder though, where do you plan to go from here? Did the apology suffice? I suppose you could ask for some of the money (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.de)
|
| |
| | Re: Fair Use vs. Infringement (was: Re: Intellectual property and the Internet)
|
|
But the problem with that argument is that, in the case mentioned, the notecard had been copyrighted. If somebody went and stole the design, he could get into trouble for copyright infrigment. The defense argued saying that they hadn't copied very (...) (23 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.de)
|
