 | | Re: Dilemma: How best to honor Gary Louie
|
|
I would think a donation to some type of Toys for Kids (Toys for Tots even) organization in Gary's name would be a good one. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | | Please do not associate my personal views with my (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Dilemma: How best to honor Gary Louie
|
|
I've a bit of a quandary that I could use some advice on. Mike Collins had a deal going with Gary and several others for Octan Twin Tank Transports ((URL) sent out and received payment for all the rest, but not from Gary. Mike decided he'd made (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fence colours
|
|
(...) But you sure as heck come close! ;) (...) Hmmm... Jeff Stembel (Ten of One) just doesn't sound right... ;) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
<36D449DD.58F405FA@umich.edu> <F7oAsz.C6z@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I'll just use logic. Consider the convex... if it works, then the concave has to as well, as the edges must be (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Fence colours
|
|
(...) Those are gear racks, not lattice pieces. Look at the Launch and Load Seaport, which has 3 white 1x16 lattice pieces. Jeff (...) has to (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
(...) by adding a 1x3 slope to each side) it would increase attachable area, and stabilize the piece. This could also be done with the medium slope (increase to 3x3 with 1x2 slope area added to each side.) Of course, If they went and did all of the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
(...) ^^^...^^^ (...) Rob (...) because (...) exist (...) Yup, I said that first, I just neglected to use accepted terminology :) I'm not sure that the concave (or inside corner, if you prefer) would give enough area to attach to a stud at the (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
(...) It was always my understanding that the reason that roof pieces have a lip (i.e. the small vertical edge before the slope starts) was to provide a standard way, independent of slope angle, to keep the interior side of the slope from "crashing (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
(...) James, if you want a low-slope gable connector, then I'd want (most assuredly Rob Farver too) a low-slope INSIDE CORNER 3x3 brick, which also doesn't exist, because that is the piece that would give a low-slope gable connector a reason to (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
|
(...) Hmm - It *should* be possible - unless I'm horribly mistaken (won't know for sure until I get home and do some comparisons), the area for a single stud on a pyramid roof peak should be the same as the area for a stud in the "corner" of a (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
