Subject:
|
Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:11:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2367 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown wrote:
> Jasper Janssen writes:
>
> > Good question... looking at my 2*4 low slope peaks, I have a feeling
> > you may indeed be right about too little clearance :(
>
> Hmm - It *should* be possible - unless I'm horribly mistaken (won't know
> for sure until I get home and do some comparisons), the area for a single
> stud on a pyramid roof peak should be the same as the area for a stud in
> the "corner" of a corner piece. They should be the same area, given that
> it's the same shape, and the angle of the slope doesn't change.
It was always my understanding that the reason that roof pieces
have a lip (i.e. the small vertical edge before the slope starts)
was to provide a standard way, independent of slope angle, to keep
the interior side of the slope from "crashing into" the studs any
of the pieces that fasten to the bottom of the roof piece.
Given this, it should be possible to produce this piece (1x2 low slope
peak) or any other low slope analogs of regular sloped pieces.
> What I want to see is a 3x3 concave corner piece. - Anyone (with more
> math skills than me) want to see if that's possible?
It is possible.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Low Corner Slopes in Roof Parts Packs?
|
| (...) James, if you want a low-slope gable connector, then I'd want (most assuredly Rob Farver too) a low-slope INSIDE CORNER 3x3 brick, which also doesn't exist, because that is the piece that would give a low-slope gable connector a reason to (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
