Subject:
|
Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming.starship
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 01:42:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2740 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrote:
| |
In short, I like the idea. But I do not think it needs to be part of the
rules, nor should it be a requirement of a GM to do it, nor should there be
restrictions on how a GM does it (for example, if a GM could possibly
appoint a non-participant web-designer as a Galactic Chief, I don’t think
anyone would complain about having a non-player around if it meant the
Starship site suddenly included an interactive database with bells and
whistles).
Ah, I haven’t rambled like that since we developed these rules... :)
-GM Hendo
|
Yes, I agree completely that these don’t need to be a part of the rules. Mostly
I was just thinking out loud. And trying to raise community awareness of the
importance of having (at least a small) Cabinet :-)
But seriously, I do encourage a Galactic Cabinet to improve the efficiency of
our highly exalted administrators. Not that the efficiency really needs to be
improved ;-) but anything that improves the overall quality and “funness” of the
game is good news.
Andrew
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
