 | | Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —Richard Parsons
| | | | (...) Sounds sensible. Happy to leave this in the purview of the GM. Once Hendo is not the GM, I am not the GC, until the new GM appoints me (or someone else). I'd stay away from electing all these positions though... Richard Still baldly going... (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —John P. Henderson
| | | | | (...) While I do like Andrew's idea here (I believe the concept was mentioned before also), I believe I see Richard's point. To keep the rules simple, I think we should stick with one elected GM who is "responsible" for the current GM duties. But, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —Andrew Engstrom
| | | | | (...) Yes, I agree completely that these don't need to be a part of the rules. Mostly I was just thinking out loud. And trying to raise community awareness of the importance of having (at least a small) Cabinet :-) But seriously, I do encourage a (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
| | | | | | |
