To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.gaming.starshipOpen lugnet.gaming.starship in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Gaming / Starship / 479
    Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —Richard Parsons
   (...) Sounds sensible. Happy to leave this in the purview of the GM. Once Hendo is not the GM, I am not the GC, until the new GM appoints me (or someone else). I'd stay away from electing all these positions though... Richard Still baldly going... (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
   
        Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —John P. Henderson
   (...) While I do like Andrew's idea here (I believe the concept was mentioned before also), I believe I see Richard's point. To keep the rules simple, I think we should stick with one elected GM who is "responsible" for the current GM duties. But, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
   
        Re: Rules Talk: Ammend GM Duties (was: GM Nominations) —Andrew Engstrom
   (...) Yes, I agree completely that these don't need to be a part of the rules. Mostly I was just thinking out loud. And trying to raise community awareness of the importance of having (at least a small) Cabinet :-) But seriously, I do encourage a (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR