 | | Re: BrikWars RV question (not from Gino this time...) —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | (...) If you're building it as a standard vehicle, sure. If you're using the RV rules to build it, then I don't know how well the math will hold up. The Vehicle Perfomance Modification rules were designed to let players modify standard vehicles (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: BrikWars RV question (not from Gino this time...) —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | (...) The main issue is that this mech is armed with a fairly large number of small (relative to it) MKII missiles, which chew up enormous emounts of -CMP". It seems incongruous to have 4 MKII missiles have as much -CMP" as a MKV laser, which is a (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: BrikWars RV question (not from Gino this time...) —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | (...) to (...) more (...) Heh. Um, never mind. I just reread the 2000 rules, and it seems that MK2 missiles no longer have a CMP. Oops. So ignore this paragraph here :) Adrian -- www.brickfrenzy.com (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: BrikWars RV question (not from Gino this time...) —Mike Rayhawk
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I kept trying to build the same kind of mechs and running into the same kind of problem. The CMP was kept high because for some reason I wanted the explosives' CMPs to remain the same for troops as for vehicles. (I guess I wanted to keep (...) (24 years ago, 3-Sep-00, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| | | | |
