Subject:
|
Re: Castle World: An Idea
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.gaming
|
Date:
|
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 06:02:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4818 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.gaming, Alex Polimeni wrote:
|
|
|
Why is something you made going to be allowed,
but CQ should be put in Fun.Gaming?
|
I have no idea what you mean here.. except that you think my ideas belong in
castle and yours do not? Im not sure why you would think this, or what
would prompt it. If youd be so kind, please elaborate.
|
Only have a short time on herer currently, reply more later
When i was first proposing CQ we all got in a big row. I forget what his name
is, but this one guy thought that CQ should go in Fun.Gaming and not in
.Castle because it was a game. However, i have seen nothing of the kind
proposed against you.
Aramir
|
ahhh, discussion centered around A
gentle Plea. If you notice, I was visibly absent from that particular
discussion. There were some merits to the discussion, but in all, IMO some
noise as it were about Castle Gaming belongs in .Castle.
Actually, I think it would be a key part of the community if I or Matt
were to make a sub-section (FTX page) regarding Castle Gaming.
When you have finalized the rules for CQ, and the site is ready, please feel
free to write to James Brown, moderator of Lugnet.Gaming to get your
link on his side-bar. And please feel free to write to Todd Lehman about
having a Lugnet Newsgroup (either Lugnet.Gaming.Castle or Lugnet.Castle.Gaming,
it doesnt matter to me).
As for nothing against you. Thats because noise like rules and
implementation havent really started yet. This mostly should be done
privately, except if the rules and the game have been published, and a call for
public feedback has been asked for. The planning of the design of the game
should be done in private or in a .gaming newsgroup. Once the game has been
finalized, aspects of the game should be published to Lugnet.Castle to generate
additional interest.
Thanks,
Ben
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Castle World: An Idea
|
| (...) Only have a short time on herer currently, reply more later When i was first proposing CQ we all got in a big row. I forget what his name is, but this one guy thought that CQ should go in Fun.Gaming and not in .Castle because it was a game. (...) (21 years ago, 21-Aug-03, to lugnet.gaming, FTX)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|