 | | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) Yup. They look more or less the same, just the text is different. Hmm... -SM Hendo (21 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Registry Gazette - interest free terms!!
|
|
Hey there Starshippers, OK, so there's plenty going on - new players, new ships, new craft. Hoo-ahh! New player James' new ship (URL) Ariadinae> (welcome James :-), Jeff's new ship (URL) DAC Torga Ceti II>, Dan's new ship (URL) USS Battlestar> and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | News Talk: DAC Announces Relaunch of older Cruiser, Construction Begins on New Capital Ship
|
|
DAC News Service Everything DAC, All the time ---...--- Embargoed until 15/04 ---...--- Today the DAC Military Council has changed it's mind about the scrapping of the Torga Ceti II. This ship is of the same class as the missing, and presumed lost (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) The one you sent again: still the same error. Churchill worked fine. Is the whole action email visible on your end? -Dan (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) I'm not sure. Did you get the Churchill's action without issue? -SM Hendo (21 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) Same thing. Could this be on my end? -Dan (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) snip (...) Hey Dan. That wasn't intended. I will send it again now. Let me know if it looks okay... -SM Hendo (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
(...) Hendo, one minor problem. All I got for the Hell's Fury was: Starship: VALCENTRAL: USS Hell’s Fury (URL) Status: USS Hell’s Fury === Coordinates: Orbiting at G1; Away Team at Formian Colony Clanesk, Darpenime No actions. Maybe this was (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RulesTalk: SMs and Running more than one Sector
|
|
All looked eminently sensible to me. I'd only reinforce the point about the need to ensure that as an SM one is up to running two sectors. I have had on average 6 or 7 ships active in New Pacific most of the time, and for me that's a chunk to do. (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Galactic Reports 04/10/04
|
|
Galactic Greetings! Travel reports have been emailed as appropriate. There have been a lot of new ships in recent weeks, so if anyone feels they have been missed, please let me know. I also mailed out actions for my sectors as needed. And finally, (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
