To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.funOpen lugnet.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Fun / 745 (-5)
  Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs!
 
(...) Ha ha ha!!! I was right all along! Seriously, though...why did Lego even bother to concieve the concept of Jack Stone? Was there any merit in attempting to create a so called "action hero" that nobody has ever heard of? I think not. Anyway, (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs!
 
(...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
 
  Lego admits minifigs are better than Jack Stone figs!
 
LOL, ok in the newest issue of Lego Magazine (May - June 2002) on page 34 they do a head-to-head comparison of Pepper and Jack Stone. And guess who wins.... Pepper!! YAY PEPPER!! Way to represent for all your fellow minifigs!! You go boy! You can (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: "Lego" candy!
 
(...) First of all the ones I had brand new tasted bad, second I found if you want to make them stick, just get them wet where you would put glue. (of course this is done by licking them....ewwwwww) jt (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: "Lego" candy!
 
(...) LOL! Thats great! But lemme tell you - unless you have glue or something there is no way you can make those buildings and such as they have pictured. I had trouble getting some of them to just sit ontop of the others. I wonder if they are (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.fun, lugnet.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR