 | | Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish)
|
|
(...) This is a follow up to my original post. I know it's bad form to reply to one's own post but I think this one works as an exception. We called TLG on the above question and after some discussions and a call back 'Brian' at Lego stated that the (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish)
|
|
(...) (Hi Dean, sorry to interrupt :) I've seen people say things similar to that before but I've never understood what has led to them feel that way. I don't think there's any such stigma here (there shouldn't be!) about replying to one's own post. (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
|
|
(...) [ie, "sorry to follow myself up] (...) There is on Usenet. I'm not sure exactly where it comes from, but it is bad nettiquette. I *think* it's to prevent one person from keeping a thread alive when no one else cares. At any rate, I have seen (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Following up oneself (Was: Re: Is LEGO safe in Fish Tanks? (Safe for the fish))
|
|
(...) Why was this followed up to debate? I don't see anything controversial! :-) Seems like good elaboration for the FAQ. ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
