 | | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) SURE!!! --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) Gesundheit! (...) Dude! All right! (...) In cases like this, it's perfectly OK to correct typos and misuses of trademarks (especially TLG trademarks). That is to say, this question could just as well be re-written as: Subject: What is (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Format of FAQ items
|
|
(...) Jeremy, Here's what I was chattering about -- here's a little demo of the prototype ng-hierarchy-TOC generator that I use to help visualize the ng layout whenever a question comes up... A top-level overview, going 2 layers deep: (URL) Just the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Who's who in Legoland
|
|
(...) Ha! Wow. Cool. (...) Yeah, me too. It's just as good as the GIF, for all practical purposes. --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Who's who in Legoland
|
|
(...) I wholeheartedly agree. In fact, this is what I've done with your graph in the Market/Auction/Awareness/5 FAQ. Which brings up the potential of ASCII art. Before the graph, Todd, you have a commented-out, preformatted ASCII chart of the same (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) Not to be anal-retentive, but you've forgotton the colons. Um, I'm not sure a pun was intended there. :-P Also, we should probably start keeping track of headers which may repeat, and those which are optional. Otherwise, it amtches my list. (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
Jeremy: (...) Both the "Originator" and the "Comment" header entries make sense. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- Here's the edited list of header entries (please verify that I haven't (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Raw FAQ data format (Was: Format of FAQ items)
|
|
Jeremy: (...) I didn't think so. What I tried to explain was how the processing tools would see the file _after_ the "Include" header had been processed. (...) ~~~...~~~ This is the critical part. I hadn't noticed it earlier. (...) Yes. Play well, (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Who's who in Legoland
|
|
(...) IMO: Embed links to webpages or directly to images via the <A> tag, but don't embed images with the <IMG> tag -- that's getting too carried away. Any collection of images worth linking to (for example, sets or minifig or parts imges) should be (...) (26 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Who's who in Legoland
|
|
(...) might (...) Why not just have two versions of the FAQ? One with images, one without. The content would virtually be the same(1). Jeff 1 - Just a short caption by images would suffice, I think. (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
