|
|
 | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Shiri, You should add a link from the FAQ page to your acronym page. Jude (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) That's sounds pretty cool. I would go even farther and have a randomly selected acronym appear on any newsgroup page on LUGNET, say at the top or something. It would be just like the taglines that used to appear on BBS's in "The Old Days". By (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| Hi Eric! Don't apologize for getting off-track - I was just confused whether you misread my post, or I misread yours. ;-) (...) Wow! I like that. Once it got coded, it would be no extra work to post it "every week" or whatever. I think that *in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Ahem... not to be mean, but yeah, probably. <grin> -Shiri (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Ha. The way I figure it, Larry would feature prominently in about 50% of any "new humourous tidbit" posted weekly. Steve (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) lugnet?" (...) I'll tell you why: * Because we're close. Most of us have met face-to-face, I think. So it's probably true of a lot of the smaller loc's, but LUGNET tends to notice it with Australia.... for some reason. ;-) * Because we don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| Crossposted to admin.general (...) <snip> While I can't take credit for Duane's great idea this is even better than what I was thinking. I was thinking just a post with an allready defined Acronym once a week to keep the visability of the page up in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: The commonfolk's FAQ
|
| (...) Agreed. The idea of posting a FAQ link once a week (if it used some new humourous tidbit so it was a fresh post) to catch the eye of newbies is also good, IMHO. And as far as adding more entries to the commonfolks FAQ... anything to reduce my (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.faq)
| | | | | Re: RGB color values for many brick colors
|
| The original Pantone pallette I used had CMYK values, I translated them via Photoshop for your convience. I assumed in web development (like the colors use on the BricWorx color selector) and most non-print graphic design are done in RGB. SteveB (23 years ago, 27-Jun-01, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.trains, lugnet.faq, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.cad)
|
|
