 | | Re: Criteria for a good toy (was RE: Fabulous Lego Drawings)
|
|
(...) I would say that all points are correctly translated, except for #7 where I would say: (...) And lets face it, point #8 is also plain, simply true, isn't it ? Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (25 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Criteria for a good toy (was RE: Fabulous Lego Drawings)
|
|
(...) Isn't that to be expected? After all, this was quoted from the "LEGO Krant", ie, the LEGO Newspaper. --Bram Bram Lambrecht BXL34@po.cwru.edu (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Criteria for a good toy (was RE: Fabulous Lego Drawings)
|
|
Say, these 10 items are the ones that Ole Kirk Christiansen (founder of LEGO) used as his criteria for creating LEGO back in the late 40's/early 50's! Gary Istok (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Criteria for a good toy (was RE: Fabulous Lego Drawings)
|
|
(...) bullets (or in this case a numbered list) always tends to catch the eye. So here is my translation of the list of criteria for a good toy: ((URL) 1) It must provide limitless possibilities for play. 2) It must be for girls and boys equally. 3) (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | S. Bonsma Reviews Mickey Sets
|
|
Sybrand, thank you for your reviews of 4 of the new Mickey sets. I completely missed seeing them until today. Thank goodness for Todd's Spolight page! Thinking that someone else might have missed them too, I wanted to mention their existence and (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.fabuland)
|
