Subject:
|
Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.events
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:19:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1665 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.events, Richard W. Schamus writes:
> (*) "Brickfest" in my humble opinion, has become synonymous to me (and
> certainly with others) with the event held in the D.C. area. To utilize the
> name of "Brickfest" in conjunction with any other event seems, at the very
> least improper, and at worst potentially infringing upon the rights of those
> who conceived and have implemented 2 events under that name. I urge those
> who discuss fests, other than the two Brickfest that have occurred and the
> next planned event, will refrain from utilizing Brickfest in such
> discussions. This is only a suggestion, but one that seems (to me at least)
> right to suggest. (This view is my own, and not endorsed or suggested by
> *The Brickfest Committee*)
I agree completely. Just had to give a me2. Both Chris and I think that
keeping Brickfest as the name for the D.C. event is a good idea; they
"coined" their name. I love the idea of holding other fests, but it would be
best to use other names, IMO.
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
| (...) Larry, All, I'm glad that you feel that way. This may make some very unhappy for geographical regions, but to have multiple fests (whatever name you use as the banner) is dilative to the "Brickfest(*)" experience. Even at once a year, I'm not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
