 | | Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
|
Of course everyone wants as close to them as possible. And why should population have anything to do with where it is held? Of course California has a huge population, there are more people crammed into that state then in the entire country of (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
|
(...) Larry, All, I'm glad that you feel that way. This may make some very unhappy for geographical regions, but to have multiple fests (whatever name you use as the banner) is dilative to the "Brickfest(*)" experience. Even at once a year, I'm not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
|
In lugnet.events, David Eaton writes: <snip> (...) <snip> I snipped most, left this one sentence, kinda sums up nicely... I am coming around to this viewpoint. Have one fest a year so *everyone* is incented to come. Rotate it around geographically? (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
| |
| | Re: I have pics but brickshelf is not happy at the mo
|
|
Hopefully these include the combined Amtrak you took pictures of :) KL (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: How about a Brickfest West?
|
|
Amusingly, just about everyone wants it held as close to them as possible! Realistically, San Francisco or south of it a bit make the most sense geographically. I suppose one could make the argument that Seattle makes the most sense for playing with (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.events)
|
