 | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good —Richard Parsons
|
| | | Tobias Möller wrote in message ... (...) Fair enough. (...) Bollocks. I can do a hell of a lot more with 18 blocks than 3. And there is nothing I can do with the big bits that I couldn't do with the small bits. Its about creativity, flexibility, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Agree with the sentiment but slightly disagree on fact. a 1x1x6 is much sturdier under torsional or shear stress than a stack of 6 1x1s are. So it can be quite useful in large structures that have to take significant loads, especially dynamic (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good —Jeff Boen
|
| | | | (...) hmmm.. except.. we all *know* that lego isn't designing these elements to do us all a favor... helping us to strengthen the structural integrity of our structures... after all, if it's a large structure and it contains a motor, i start to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Juniorization is (somewhat) good —Tobias Möller
|
| | | | I like the big bricks. They are great for pirate stuff! And the big windows, i love those too! (1*4*6) --Tobias onyx skrev i meddelandet ... (...) do us (...) i (...) base... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Nov-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
