 | | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) Your argument is just as baseless as mine. Putting together (packing) an old Technic set would only cost more because they used to use more bricks (using value as a comparison). And I never actually mentioned old sets in my post. (...) My (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A System Suggestion
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Daniel Barrett writes: [snip] (...) It's this possibility of multi-themed usage that makes your sugesstion particulary interesting. Greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) This is baseless. I suspect Lego's internal production lines are not exactly primed for this. I.e. costs for putting together old Technic sets might be very high, for all I know. Furthermore, Lego representatives have pointed out on several (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | A System Suggestion
|
|
Dear LEGO, I would like to suggest a different approach to the system line, a modular castle set. The LEGO Company follows a fairly standard approach to the system line. You have your low cost entry sets, a range of mid-cost sets, and then one top (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | The writing on the wall
|
|
"We're redefining Lego. It's not just about bricks" "Within the construction area, you can only grow so much" These two sentences mark a clear departure from the traditional Lego reporting approach (or should I say PR?). I used to love when articles (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) Agreed. Luckily I have quite a collection of beams and such already and LEGO should last forever so I'm set. It's still a sad sad thing that is going on :( /Tobbe (URL) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) Or even 4795 - Underwater Base! How about a "spot the technic in non-technic sets" competition? William (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) Only (...) but (...) This may all come true (sadly), but if Lego Direct expect to be able to compete in selling these sets they are going to have to *SERIOUSLY* improve their non-box shipping operation. 20 days to answer a pre-sales question (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) I'd buy sets contained in a sturdy brown cardboard box made of recycled materials with just a bar code on it if it meant I got the parts. This would be from online sellers of course like TRU's web site, Lego woudn't want these packs on shop (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Is "traditional" Technic being killed off?
|
|
(...) this article, I only see that they are moving into other areas in addition to building bricks. On the subject of the traditional technic beams, you can still find them in newish sets like 8458 and 8466. You can hardly construct a large, stable (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
