 | | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
|
(...) But everyone IS entitled to their opinion and... Sorry, I had to. I agree though, "this set sucks but is good for parts" is becoming redundant and has reached the level of "me too" posts. I think a lot of the Star Wars ships are very good in (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
|
(...) No. All the posts lately are very inflammatory, and I don't get it. It would be different if Lego was putting out 'nothing but' juniorization and z-nap. But we've got model class x-wings, lego direct, and other stuff that I see as very (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Mark Sandlin writes: <snip> (...) Oh, Yesss! (...) (reading) "... inverse slope computers ..." ... (reading again) "... INVERSE slope computers ..." (digging through the depths of childhood memories) "Weren't those the cool (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
|
(...) I'm not sure about anyone else, but I couldn't care less if my LEGO is "collectible." I love my bricks because I BUILD with them. Most of what I love about Classic Space is the CS logo. If LEGO would release a CS decorated brick pack, that (...) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Going Against the Grain
|
|
(...) Interesting you should say that. A diorama at the Orlando LIC had a hive of the Insectoids burying the skeletons of Roboforce bodies. It was pretty wild. The Roboforce was mounting a rescue in another corner. I guess they were too late ;-) (24 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
