| |
Carbon 60 wrote:
>
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > No. 4560 is BETTER than 4561 because it doesn't come with the rather
> > useless transformer. And 3225 is easily better than 4559. Although, as
> > you say, it *is* a set rather than just a collection of cars or a
> > locomotive.
>
> 3225 is not a set it's a train - it deserves it's own category along with 4558
> and 4565. A set in the model train world is something that can operate just
> using the components in the package.
Ah, no. We've had that debate already. MOST sets have track and a power
pack included but it's not required. I think I've been active in MR
since before you were born.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Stickers - Problems
|
| (...) 3225 is not a set it's a train - it deserves it's own category along with 4558 and 4565. A set in the model train world is something that can operate just using the components in the package. (...) It's been said before, 4561 would be so good (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
