| |
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> No. 4560 is BETTER than 4561 because it doesn't come with the rather
> useless transformer. And 3225 is easily better than 4559. Although, as
> you say, it *is* a set rather than just a collection of cars or a
> locomotive.
3225 is not a set it's a train - it deserves it's own category along with 4558
and 4565. A set in the model train world is something that can operate just
using the components in the package.
> So I'd rank 4559 and 4561 as the worst two.
It's been said before, 4561 would be so good with a better loco - I'm going to
buy 1 4560 and 1 4561 and build them back to back. Might look a bit more like
a suburban train then.
Carbon 60
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Stickers - Problems
|
| (...) No. 4560 is BETTER than 4561 because it doesn't come with the rather useless transformer. And 3225 is easily better than 4559. Although, as you say, it *is* a set rather than just a collection of cars or a locomotive. So I'd rank 4559 and (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
