To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 135
    Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Steve Bliss
   Form letters are much less effective than individually written letters. Steve (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Jeff Stembel
   It's not like it matters much. They only seem to look for the phrase "I would like to suggest..." and then they send you a form letter. Jeff (...) a (...) way. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) Which, to this consumer anyway, is much less effective than an individually written letter would be. :-) I was at the LIC at MoA in MPLS last nite (met with John Neal, that was fun... more in the mpls group later this AM) Before we met I was (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —David Blomberg
   It would be useful to post addresses and names of individuals that we should write to. (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —James Brown
   (...) Agreed. I've been following the "we should write letters" thread, and (while I come down on the non-form letters side) I agree that it is a good thing. However, most people don't have the slightest clue of where to send such a letter. Could (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —Todd Lehman
   (...) ^^^...^^^ (...) ^^^...^^^ If you mean assistance in concealing the identity of a poster who wants to post the name and/or address of a TLG employee, then the answer is No Way; anonymous postings are against the Terms of Use of the lugnet.com (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
   
        Re: New Service Packs for 1999.. —James Brown
   (...) by (...) post (...) anonymous (...) Absolutely! I was unclear. Even disregarding the Terms of Use (which I'm not), I have personal moral objections to the forwarding of private information, anonymous or otherwise. What I had meant to state is (...) (26 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR