Subject:
|
Re: TLCs stance on stop-motion films?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:05:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1090 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Does anyone know thier stance? If someone made a movie using Lego elements
> instead of clay or something but didn't actually point out the fact that it • was
> Lego, (they treated the film completly serious and never pointed out the fact
> that it was made with Lego it simply was, just as one makes animated clay
> films.) Would that person be able to sell the film? (assuming anyone actually
> would want it) I don't know if I would ever do this but I have heard of those
> that did.
I am no expert, but its hard to see why you would need to involve lego unless
you were using their trademarks.
Lego cant stop you doing anything with the bricks youve bought. I understand
that they tried with the guy who built concentration camp models and failed.
As long as you call it 'art' you can get away with anything!
regards
lawrence
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | TLCs stance on stop-motion films?
|
| Does anyone know thier stance? If someone made a movie using Lego elements instead of clay or something but didn't actually point out the fact that it was Lego, (they treated the film completly serious and never pointed out the fact that it was made (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
