 | | You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | Another great missive. Here's my comment. So far we've been all over the map on feedback. No topic is off bounds because, finally, someone actually popped up and said "yes, we want to listen". But too much of a muchness is too much(1)! So to help (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Matthews
|
| | | | | Dear Brad, Whether we like him or not, Larry is our Leader. I do not know Larry, but have been reading his posts for the past >year. Larry can come to the quick on most any topic quite lucidly. Listen to Larry, he is our man. Build On! John Matthews (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Matthews
|
| | | | | | | Whoops! Sorry for the *ugly* post! 80 characters per line? Is it me, MS, or other? I hate it when that happens! I still meant what I said about Larry, though. John John Matthews <jmatthew@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | All Hail Larry! At the risk of drifting off-topic allow me to digress a moment. John, are you a lurking Larritarian?! If so, rejoice! Send your 1 brick love offering to Larry in Ada and receive a bounty 100 fold!! Do not take this offer lightly... (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | | | Amen, brother John! Hey, who unsubscribed me from that group?! -- "Hail to the chief!" Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) Hooray! Hooray! Its Y2K! A new decade starts next year. John Neal wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | | (...) He is? Don't get me wrong, I like Larry and all, but I didn't even know we HAD a leader. I assume you're just being silly, but let's not give Brad the wrong impression! (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yup. Larry's a good egg, and has possibly the best business sense of anyone on Lugnet(1), but this particular member of a motley rabble doesn't call him boss. 1:but that kind of thing is difficult to ascertain from a newsgroup James (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Matthew Verdier
|
| | | | | | John Matthews wrote in message ... (...) Bzz, sorry, thank you for playing. Larry does not speak for me, nor is he my leader. If anyone is in charge here on LUGNET it is Todd and Suzanne. No offense, Larry. I just don't want Brad and Lego to get the (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I agree. I think the post was mostly in fun, and my head has returned to its normal (for me, that is, somewhat swelled) size. (...) Right. And I didn't even get a sword thrown at me, much less meet a watery tart! (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) It's all in fun. Lighten up, Frances;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —John Matthews
|
| | | | | | Just to clarify, I was only about half serious. The other half was just me being mischievous. Sorry for the misunderstanding. John Matthews Matthew Verdier <matthewv@digital.net> wrote in message news:Fn7y5o.Dx6@lugnet.com... (...) he (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 05:09:16 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) But can you convince Novera that there is benefit/realisable reward, for receiving its payment in train doors&windows?? (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Hehe, naaa... we'd want cash, or a slice of the rev just like we do with everyone else. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 23:50:46 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) Of course! But what about your slice of the pie, then........ Finders fee, whatever! "Please remit my finders fee in X number of train windows!" (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
