|
|
 | | Re: surrender, you're surrounded!
|
| (...) The issue wasn't explicitly stated as such. The issue was explicitly stated, in the original post, as coming from the AFOL community, not just you. (...) ANd you should, indeed, state your opinion, but make it abundantly clear that it is your (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
| Ooooh! :( What a pessimistic AFOL you are, William! (...) Yes, they're trying to grow a segment of their market. That gives "us" influence as customers, little as it may be. Did we get SYSTEM-color packs with gray plates and bricks through Jake, or (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
| (...) Wait... would that be new brown...or old brown? (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| | | | | surrender, you're surrounded!
|
| Hello David! There can be no color debate thread without you, right? ;) (...) OF COURSE it is to ME. Who do you think did type this? My CAT?? (...) In fact I'm afraid there is not much thinking at all involved with those posts. Different interests (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego) !
| | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company
|
| In lugnet.general, William R. Ward wrote: [whatever] William, it would've been really nice if you didn't post this to half of LUGNET. C'mon, this is spamming. The only groups it needed go to were the two groups you set as FUT. Anything more just (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
