|
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| David Chapman Adams (13) Richmond, VA, USA, I do not make a certain amount of money and thus do not have a certain budget for Legos. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| I do support this letter. Martin Legault, Canada. Spent a hole bunch of money in 2004 to buy the last batch of old color. Nothing on 2004 set where new color are predominant. Planned budget for 2005, not much. (20 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Hats off to Jake!
|
| Hello! And thanks to every LEGO employee who ever designed a great set, in particular those responsible for sets #851 (1977), #375 (1978), #928 (1979), #7740 (1980), #6382 (1981), #6950 (1982), #1592 (1983), #6080 (1984), #6392 (1985), #6067 (1986), (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| I agree and sign below: Mark Bellis (31), Derby (UK). 2003 expenditure £2227 including £80 of SYSTEM light grey plates. 2004 expenditure £3415 including £830 of SYSTEM light grey plates. 2005 expenditure so far £678 of SYSTEM dark grey plates and (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) Matt Chiles (33), Centerville, WA, USA, $500+ pre 2004, $50 in 2004 (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) I would suggest cancelling this entire thread, and finalising the wording before re-posting. ROSCO (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| In lugnet.color, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Then not to point this out, but when people sign 'petitions', they are usually under the impression that the petition they sign is the one that is going to be received. By (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) I was just starting to acumulate old brown bricks too! I sign! Daniel Warren (23), Canada, $2500 - $3000 since '03 (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) Thanks for this input, Kelly! Of course the authors of the letter had not the intention to speak for all AFOLs. This is in fact a (minor) mistranslation. It will be fixed before the letter is handed out to Jan. Kind Regards, Ben (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
| (...) * snip * A couple of quick observations, if you don't mind. 1. Capitalize the "we" in the first paragraph. 2. No need to define the AFOL acronym if it isn't used in the remaining body of the letter. Leave the Adult Fans of LEGO as a complete (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |