Subject:
|
Re: peeron updates?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.db.inv
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:53:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
773 times
|
| |
|
|
I guess it depends on which "update" you're talking about. I think that
posting a note occasionally to the newsgroup listing new sets added recently
is definitely a useful thing to continue. But I don't think that an "Added,
Thanks" note needs to be posted to the newsgroup confirming each and every
inventory that was posted in the newgroup. For those I prefer to just get
an e-mail message confirmation. Again, I'm not strongly for or against
either position; that's just my gut reaction.
In lugnet.db.inv, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.db.inv, Samuel Christiansen writes:
> > I appreciate hearing back from you. It's nice to get confirmation that the
> > inventory was noticed. I think I prefer getting an e-mail simply because it
> > clogs the newsgroup up less. It also starts an e-mail thread that I use to
> > communicate mistakes, changes, questions, or comments.
>
> Hmm, I disagree on this point... I'd rather "clog" the newsgroup than "clog"
> people's email accounts, if that makes sense. Not that I think *either* is a
> clog. The newsgroup is meant for posting inventories - isn't that what
> you're doing, Jenn? I say stick to the NG; that way it's accessible for
> people to look back, etc.
>
> just MHO.
> -Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: peeron updates?
|
| (...) Hmm, I disagree on this point... I'd rather "clog" the newsgroup than "clog" people's email accounts, if that makes sense. Not that I think *either* is a clog. The newsgroup is meant for posting inventories - isn't that what you're doing, (...) (23 years ago, 3-Aug-01, to lugnet.db.inv)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
